Time for a Fresh Start on Drug Policies

The alternative to adopting new and progressive policies on drugs is more prisons and the marginalization of even larger numbers of Taiwan’s youth

Amid talk of constitutional reform and experts’ evaluations of drug laws in an era of surging substance use and jail overcrowding, the time has come for Taiwanese society and officials to engage in intelligent debate on the subject.

According to government statistics the No. 1 cause of death in Taiwan for the past 31 years has been cancer, with lung and liver cancers leading the way.

Of the top 10 causes of death in Taiwan, year after year, alcohol and tobacco — two legal drugs — played a role. Together, they knock into a cocked hat any other possible cause of death. It has been stated that even if by some miracle Taiwan were to become” tobacco free,” there would still be 200,000 smoking-related deaths over the next 20 years. In 2012 the FDA announced that the top 5 drugs abused in Taiwan were (with the exception of the legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco, which kill vastly more Taiwanese than any other drug) Heroin (62.8%), Meths/Amphetamine (31.1%), Ketamine (5%) followed by Zolpidem (a prescription medicine) and Ecstasy. Apparently abuse of sleeping pills and other prescribed, legal, drugs is also becoming more prevalent.

There was no mention, by the way, of cannabis. I won’t call it marijuana because that was a joke name invented to rhyme with Tijuana to make it sound more Mexican. Indeed I could not find a single case where it is accepted by reliable sources that cannabis was responsible as the sole and only cause of death, anywhere in the world.

To read, then, that in Taiwan, “Legislators defend the current policies, arguing that addiction, namely to heroin, the deadliest and the island’s most abused drug, is poison to the economy,” befuddles the mind. Clearly it is alcohol and tobacco that pose the biggest problems to the nation’s health and economy. Is there then something we are not aware of in considering this lack of logic? Maybe heavy lobbying by the alcohol and tobacco industries on Taiwanese legislators, government officials and decision makers is the reason. We could look at the record, but unfortunately there is nothing to loom at because the “past six years of records held by the Ministry of Justice’s Agency Against Corruption show that while there are more than 700,000 records of civil servants receiving gifts, attending banquets and being asked to lobby on government project cases, other than receiving gifts, the Presidential Office and the Executive Yuan have made no such declarations of gratuities.” So we don’t know.

Like almost everywhere else around the world, Taiwan’s drug policies are not based on harm reduction through science-based fact. Instead, they are based on politics and supported by ignorance. The drug categories are wrong and need to be reviewed. Certainly cannabis, a Category 2 drug, is a lot less harmful than Ketamine, a Category 3 substance. Of course cannabis is also a lot less harmful than the legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco. Often my Taiwanese friends say to me, “Yes, but you are from the West. We here in Taiwan, we don’t have a history of drug culture and of our leaders being involved in drugs, unlike yours.”

But as usual, the facts say otherwise. It is a historical fact that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was involved in drugs and gangs since its inception. Indeed, up until recently, the KMT was involved in the drug trade on an industrial scale in South East Asia and did so for decades.[1]

Indeed archaeologists tell us that the first documented use of cannabis in the entire world occurred right here in Taiwan, 10,000 years ago![2]

Those who think that “Chinese society” is conservative and “anti drugs,” and that it is only a problem for the “decadent West” should think again. Next door, China is cashing in on cannabis and holds most of the world’s patents for it.

For Taiwan to alleviate and more efficiently deal with drugs, it should adopt better, more intelligent, science-based policies to counter the harm that drugs do (with alcohol and tobacco once again topping the list). At a time of scarce resources and bulging overcrowded prisons, Taiwan should not be sending armies of its youth behind bars as it is nowadays. Building more prisons won’t work. Yet Taiwan does not need to re-invent the wheel: For best practices, look to Sweden, where they actually closed four prisons, not because their crime rate fell, but because they looked more intelligently at alternatives to incarceration.

The economic case for a radical rethink is obvious. A recent report titled “Ending the Drug Wars” by the London School of Economics (LSE) Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy stated in its summary that, “It is time to end the ‘war on drugs’ and massively redirect resources towards effective evidence-based policies underpinned by rigorous economic analysis.” I note that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen obtained her PhD in Law from the LSE. One might I hope that she take note of what her alma mater has to say on the subject and incorporate some of those findings into her policies.

It is largely accepted that the judicial system in Taiwan is broken. In March 2013, a group of 10 independent international experts reviewed Taiwan’s human rights record and made a number of recommendations. Among them were that the courts should reduce the too harsh prison sentences imposed on first-time, non-violent, drug offenders. The group also noted that Taiwan had signed and ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which among other things outlaw the death penalty and underline the rights of defendants to have prosecution witnesses present at their trial. Yet the courts here still largely ignore these conventions, which have been incorporated into domestic law.

The outside world is moving on. With the recent decriminalisation of cannabis in Uruguay, Colorado and Washington State, coupled with the already liberal policies existing in Portugal, Holland and elsewhere, Taiwan should re-assess its “War on Drugs” policies. It has become widely accepted that the whole “War on Drugs” has been a failure. For some 40 years, vested interests around the world have compelled governments to engage in prohibition, which, just like the prohibition against alcohol (or prostitution or spying), was never going to work. It has cost the world trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives and failed utterly to control, regulate and rehabilitate.

Most people, at least those who have access to the right information and know the facts, are beginning to realise the terrible harm being done to their own society by these failed policies. For example a recent study in the U.S. found that almost 50% of black males and 40% of white males had been arrested by the age of 23. Yet the hypocrisy and double standards of government are painfully apparent, such as in the cases involving HSBC and the U.K.’s alcohol and tobacco industries.

No drug is completely risk-free; all come with different levels of risk. But how societies choose to deal with them must be based on science, not emotion. Again, decisions on the matter should be based on scientific facts, not rumors.[3]

But there are also benefits. The use of medical cannabis is widespread and growing. Now that it is becoming decriminalized, more research is taking place. There must be families in Taiwan who would benefit from knowing this. I believe it is criminally incompetent of the medical profession not to help people (especially children) who may benefit from this natural, age-old (and perhaps even originally Taiwanese) plant.[4]

In conclusion, I would urge people to educate themselves about the facts. I would hope that Taiwan’s decision makers will have the intelligence and strength of character to take positive, science-based steps forward. The alternative, which is happening now, is for people to ignore the problem and build ever more prisons and marginalize even larger numbers of Taiwan’s youth. As Albert Einstein once said, “The definition of stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

1. For more information, see http://www.amazon.com/The-Secret-Army-Kai-shek-Warlords/dp/0470830182, http://thediplomat.com/2012/06/taiwan-and-the-mob/, and http://www.takaoclub.com/opium/postjapan.htm

2. See also http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/1.htm

3. For the best resources on all drugs, see http://www.drugscience.org.uk/ and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkcO_wJ9yKo

4. For more information, see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/charlottes-web-marijuana_n_4261935.html, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAFu-Ihwyzg, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPKDkPZyE-o, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNjZqzmNiAc and http://www.cnbc.com/id/36022433

2 thoughts on “Time for a Fresh Start on Drug Policies”

  1. If in-fact the Republic of China’s Taiwan is the origin or agricultural as Carl Sagan postulated.
    If in-fact agricultural enabled modern sedentary society as we know it today.
    If in-fact the USA and the People’s Republic of China are legalizing and patenting Cannabis medicines.
    Then a dialog must be started regarded the end of Cannabis Prohibition in the Republic of China (Taiwan).
    Taiwan’s textile industry uses cotton and synthetics because Cannabis fiber is not available any longer.
    If in-fact the Republic of China is so concerned about the possibility of the drug potential of Cannabis the specifics of that drug potential verses the fiber benefit must enter the dialog. Japan’s stance is “Cannabis for Rope not dope.
    A wise person might also wish to consider that the control of the means of production seems to have been the real barrier to cannabis. In the past anyone purchasing cannabis flowers received viable seeds which allowed them to have uncontrolled, unmonitored ability to produce their own cannabis flowers without paying taxes to the government. Today, cannabis flowers are sold as a seedless product. Commercial seeds are feminized (desirable female cannabis plants have cuttings made of them, the cuttings are turned male by being treating with colloidal-silver to produce (genetically female) pollen so the desirable female cannabis plants can bread with themselves) so that control of the means of production is firmly held in the hands of the government. Legal drugs like Alcohol and Tobacco (both of which are deadly to humans) are profitable to governments because the means of production is, likewise, firmly held in the hands of the government.
    Perhaps, a wise reader may still be strongly against cannabis’ drug potential. Fair enough, Japan produces drug free cultivars to produce fiber (again, closely scrutinized by the government) and their Emperor still wears clothes made of cannabis fiber to this day. Lastly, people in Taiwan and around the world value Cannabis food 七味唐辛子 and fiber 麻.
    Post script: Taiwan’s native weed Humulus japonicus freely interbreeds with Cannabis, why not produce a food and fiber plant that could be grown in landslide prone areas to protect the environment and produce a commercial product?
    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2014/04/19/lifestyle/cannabis-the-fiber-of-japan/#.VNLp8HaxzGI

    Reply
  2. What does “Taiwan’s native weed Humulus japonicus freely interbreeds with Cannabis” mean?
    Wild Cannabis, commonly known as Marijuana, is found growing unchecked all over the island of Taiwan.
    To those who say: “No, Humulus japonicus is just a troublesome weed not the drug called WEED or POT…”
    Marijuana was prohibited when anti Cannabis sativa laws were put into place around the world.
    In 1972 an important court ruling in the US affected world attitudes and laws when it ruled that there was no Cannabis indica only Cannabis exists. Because of the ruling Cannabis indica was reclassified as a Cannabis sativa Subspecies. The rational was that if a Species of plant could produce viable fertile offspring with a plant of the Species Cannabis sativa then it must be Species: Cannabis sativa. The differences between what were originally distinct Species were pushed aside as a new taxonomy was borne. Cannabis ruderalis and Cannabis indica became Cannabis sativa ssp. ruderalis and Cannabis sativa ssp. indica in order to maintain the validity and enforceability of Cannabis sativa prohibitory laws.
    In reality, nature knows no fences. Species as different as Lions and Tigers produce viable fertile offspring. And, so while it is a widely accepted “FACT” that separate “Species do not produce viable fertile offspring” it is simply untrue. Humulus yunnanensis, Humulus japonicus, and even Humulus lupulus can all reproduce with Cannabis sativa and produce viable fertile offspring. And so, I suppose legally Taiwan is covered in Marijuana in the form of Cannabis sativa ssp. japonicus.
    Lastly, since Taiwan was once inhabited by separately evolving groups which continued to interbreed to some extent, up to and until “Marijuana Prohibitionists” eradicated the domesticated hemp-like Cannabaceae on the island but what were the hybridization affects to the long-term genetic make-up of the remaining non-hemp-like Cannabaceae group here? Might researchers discover our useless weed Humulus japonicus has useful medical qualities or should we simply push on with the War on Drugs and destroy the evil Cannabis sativa ssp. japonicus without bothering to research anything?

    Reply

Leave a Comment