The Great Power That Can’t Help Itself

The public humiliation of a young Taiwanese entertainer in South Korea has sparked outrage among the Taiwanese, who retaliated with an even more powerful weapon — their votes
13487_2016-01-15_230313
J. Michael Cole
By

Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜) isn’t her usual bubbly self in the short video, which has spread like brushfire in social media over the past 24 hours. The Taiwan-born 16-year-old member of the South Korean pop band TWICE has been forced to apologize, on film, for holding a Nationalist flag (symbol for the Republic of China) during a recent filming, and, reading from a script, to “admit” that she is Chinese rather than Taiwanese. Visibly shaken, the young woman doesn’t exactly radiate pride in her avowed Chineseness. In fact, it is clear that the confession, which has drawn many comparisons to videos produced by the Islamic State, was made under duress and under threat by her South Korean agent and Chinese sponsors that her career as an entertainer would be jeopardized should she refuse to humiliate herself on camera.

What is most shocking about the incident (besides the idea that Chinese zealots would force a 16-year-old to go through this) is its timing. As the confession was beginning to spread on the Internet (more than 2.5 million views on YouTube since Jan. 15), millions of Taiwanese were readying to vote for their future president and parliament in the sixth free general election since their country democratized after decades of authoritarian rule. By depicting Chou as a “Taiwanese splittist” for displaying the ROC flag, those responsible for this incident confirmed once again why the majority of Taiwanese want nothing to do with becoming part of the People’s Republic of China.

With their act, the geniuses at Huawei, the Chinese cellphone maker that, after Chou’s “crime” was exposed and sparked “outrage” in hypersensitive China, pressured South Korea’s LG Uplus to cease all cooperation with Chou, have succeeded in offending not only Taiwanese patriots but also many supporters of the Beijing-friendly Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) who take great pride in the ROC. Chou has endorsed Huawei’s Y6 cellphone in the South Korean market. LG Uplus has signed a partnership with Huawei for its LTE network equipment.

Unsurprisingly, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT and James Soong (宋楚瑜), who is running for the presidency as head of the People First Party, have both condemned the attack against Chou and maintain that she has nothing to apologize for. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also stepped in on Saturday, saying there was nothing wrong with the young woman displaying the flag of her country. Meanwhile, the response among supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is widely expected to be elected on Saturday, has been scathing and voluminous.

“This is the final straw. [The] KMT is done tomorrow as this video gets posted all over FB,” one Netizen wrote. “Communist China pig pressured, and directing the fucking dirty China pig 黃安, a poor, jobless, brainless, out-of-dated middle-aged singer did it,” wrote another, referring to Taiwanese singer Huang An, a pro-Beijing entertainer who has made it his “duty” to tip-off the Chinese government about the activities of Taiwanese entertainers and who is believed to have exposed Chou’s “transgression.” Indicatively, the Taiwan-born Huang, who reportedly became a Chinese citizen in 2001, is said to have called upon the pro-unification “ex” gangster Chang An-le (張安樂), a.k.a. White Wolf, to provide him personal protection when he returns to Taiwan during Lunar New Year.

The incident has also competed with, and at times overtaken, reporting on Taiwan’s elections on all major TV channels since Jan. 15.

Once again the bluntness of China’s nationalism has prompted experts to ask who was behind the decision to take such action and, in this particular case, at such a critical time in cross-strait relations. Was it directed by Beijing as part of its strategy to sideline Taiwan, or was it simply the initiative of an overzealous Chinese who, though well intentioned (from the perspective of Chinese nationalism), perhaps did not fully comprehend the consequences of his action?

While it is unlikely that senior Chinese Communist Party officials are behind most of those decisions, they are not entirely blame-free either, as it was the CCP that after all created the monster of strident nationalism that characterizes much of Chinese behavior at home and abroad, even among young Chinese who are receiving a liberal-democratic education in the West (for more on the mechanisms by which the CCP leadership has shaped and exploited nationalism among Chinese from a very early age, I strongly recommend Zheng Wang’s Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations). Thus, when an ultranationalist feels compelled to put a blameless 16-year-old through a traumatizing struggle session and to threaten her career as an entertainer, the CCP lies not far behind as the mastermind of a nationalism that is becoming increasingly self-defeating and, for the international community, undoubtedly worrying. Although the timing of the Chou case could not have been worse, the attack is not an isolated incident and is very much part of a trend that never ended, not even during the nearly eight years of rapprochement between Taipei and Beijing.

Needless to say, Chou’s management agency, JYP Entertainment Corp, also deserves opprobrium for giving in to Chinese extraterritoriality and subjecting one of its stars to such treatment.

Although the Chou affair is unlikely to have a decisive impact on the elections in Taiwan, many observers have reported being told by Taiwanese that the incident had emboldened them to vote, even if they have to travel to do so. If ever there was a sign of maturity among the Taiwanese, this is it: After the initial flash of anger, they responded to an affront by peacefully casting a vote. In the end, Taiwan wins.

 

J. Michael Cole is editor in chief of Thinking Taiwan, a senior non-resident fellow at the China Policy Institute, University of Nottingham, and an Associate researcher at the French Center for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC) in Taipei.

17 Responses to “The Great Power That Can’t Help Itself”

January 18, 2016 at 6:25 pm, Yifang Hong said:

The relationship between Taiwan and China is weird, and to be honest, that between Taiwanese and Chinese is even more weird. People are kind but furious or asserting statements when it comes to politics. I’m from Taiwan, and I’m proud to be Taiwanese. I mean, I have nothing to do with China.

Reply

January 19, 2016 at 2:43 pm, Andrew Whyte said:

Bobby, you and I both know that you have never been to Taiwan.

Reply

January 20, 2016 at 11:02 pm, Bobby said:

Andrew, you and I both know, you are a White Christian-Judaic male fundamentalist.

Reply

January 19, 2016 at 7:45 pm, Mike Fagan said:

Bobby,

So what are you saying here? That there is no significant cultural difference between the Taiwanese and the Chinese because they share the same language, have the same ethnicity and follow the same religions?

Analogously, one could claim that there is no significant cultural difference between the Americans and the English on the same grounds. Yet look at the disdain the Americans have for “sawker” (or “kicky-ball”), and conversely the attitude by some English rugby fans that “American Football” should be better known as “armoured wankball”. Or consider that whilst abortion is a long-standing controversy in the U.S., it is almost regarded as a non-issue in the U.K. And so on and on.

Similarly, the Taiwanese generally consider eating dogs to be barbaric (it is illegal) and whilst it does occasionally occur, dog meat markets and restaurants are an open practice in China where it is considered entirely normal. Or look at the Taiwanese fondness for driving scooters (mopeds) which is entirely new and unfamiliar to Chinese who visit Taiwan. More pertinently, consider attitudes toward authority in Taiwan and China; in Taiwan authorities can be ignored or openly defied if they are perceived to be in the wrong, whereas this attitude might very well get you kidnapped in China.

These are all significant differences – to a certain value of “significant”.

Reply

January 20, 2016 at 11:25 pm, Bobby said:

Lol mao, you completely rolled your eyes over what I wrote, but that’s OK: let’s keep the White Christian-Judaic fundamentalism outside on the fringes of Chinese-Taiwanese culture, and Asia in general, political debate is fine, but Abrahamic religious fundamentalism and sectarian violence is something Asian have done very well without; pivot to Asia? You guys have a lot of unfinished business with your terrible Christian-Judaic oppression against the native Semitic people (the Palestinian people) and other nationalities of Islamic faith in the Middle East and North Africa omg lool … (Article on the Tyranny of White Jesus Propaganda) m.huffpost.com/us/entry/jesus-wasnt-white-and-heres-why-that-matters_us_567968c9e4b014efe0d6bea5

Reply

January 20, 2016 at 1:13 pm, SNOOPY LOVES TAIWAN said:

War is approaching between Taiwan and China to clarify the ownership of Taiwan.

The “Asian Spring Movement” (#AsianSpring) will use Capitalism, Christianity, international support, Internet, and most of all, the belief in universal human rights, to remove the political cancer called Communism from China. We have universal human rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of press to allow us to become better global citizens to tackle global issues like climate change and corruption in international business.

Even though the native-borne Taiwanese makes up 80% of the population of Taiwan, we have been politically suppressed by the foreign-borne Taiwanese who lost the Chinese Civil war 1949 to the Communist Party and escaped to Taiwan where they killed many native-borne Taiwanese and stole the whole island from them. As part of its military Marshall Law, they started to impose Mandarin as the official language Taiwanese Hokkien (commonly known as “Taiwanese”) and Hakka. It was the Kuo-min-tang’s stupid idea to name Taiwan the “Republic of China” so they can keep the false hope alive that they take back the mainland. The native-borne Taiwanese did not fight the Communist in China. We were recovering from 50 years of occupation from the Japan Empire. We are peaceful and loving people who never had a strong military. However, will rather die than to be ruled by the Chinese Communist Party so we are not afraid to fight a war. China should be afraid.

We share the same fundamental values with the United States of America. We both place the value on “God, Country, and Family” in this order. Our faith in God allows us to be humble and respectful of other societies and therefore we have friends from all over the world. The Bible says “the truth shall set you free.” (John 8:32). Evil flourishes when good people stop caring. Communism which is based on lies. Even though Capitalism binds western world and China together, the fundamental philosophical difference between a belief in truth or lies has to be address now.

During the evening before the 2015-01-16 Taiwan Election, the young people from both major political parties saw Tzuyu’s apology video and unified in the common cause to condemn the human rights violation. The current Taiwan President complained to China and Korea.

The native-borne Taiwanese (Democratic Progressive Party) just elected their president on 2015-01-16 and controlled the majority of the legislature. For the first time in Taiwan’s history, they can control the direction of moving towards INDEPENDENCE without the political interference from the foreign-borne Taiwanese (Kuo-min-tang).

We are really sick of the nearly a hundred year of oppression from these combined FOREIGN influences: Japan imperial government, foreign borne Taiwanese in Kuo-min-tang party and Chinese Communist Party, we are ready to fight for our basic human rights. We are inspired by what the American politician, Patrick Henry, said before the American Revolution, “Give me liberty, or give me death!”

Reply

Comments are welcome, but will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive language, personal attacks or self-promotion will not be published. We encourage healthy discussion and, above all, tolerance of other's views.